The battle to summon Azealia Banks in a lawsuit in opposition to Elon Musk and Tesla is heating up. Final week, Dean Kristy of Fenwick & West, a lawyer representing Musk, filed an opposition arguing in opposition to the allowance of a subpoena of Azealia Banks, in addition to these of Grimes, Enterprise Insider, Gizmodo, and The New York Times. Kristy argued that the movement for going away to serve preservation subpoenas was primarily a try and “sensationalize” law hearing.
On Monday, Adam M. Apton of Levi & Korsinsky, the agency representing the traders, fired again. Apton advised Enterprise Insider that the agency is in search of to subpoena Banks partly attributable to issues that Musk, Tesla, or others related to them might stress the rapper to destroy data that may very well be related within the case.
About a now-deleted tweet that Banks posted to her personal Twitter account on Friday, Apton added the concern that “attorneys appear to be pressuring Ms. Banks to hide and destroy proof.” The tweet stated that Musk’s attorneys had beforehand taken her telephone and instructed they tried tampering with data.
The buyers are suing Tesla and Musk in a category-motion lawsuit, claiming that Musk made false and deceptive statements when he tweeted about plans to take the corporate personal at $420 a share. These tweets, the criticism alleges, negatively impacted individuals who bought Tesla inventory quickly after Musk tweeted about his plans, as they falsely believed that he had funding secured to take the corporate personality.
Banks, for her half, advised Enterprise Insider on Monday that she was not all for testifying within the case, a reversal from the earlier pleasure she expressed on the subject. Banks stated that she had advised Musk’s legal professionals about her reticence earlier within the day on Monday.